Arielle Assouline-Lichten y Caroline James, dos estudiantes de la Harvard Graduate School of Design habían iniciado una petición "on line" pidiendo a los miembros que administran el premio más importante de la arquitectura que reconsiderase esa decisión. No es difícil entender la solidaridad con la campaña a favor del Pritzker de Denise Scott Brown, el caso ha puesto de relieve la condición y reconocimiento que se da a las mujeres en el campo.
Denise Scott Brown respondió con cierta acritud: "Creo que va a ser conocido como el premio de los tristes y viejos hombres blancos".
El texto completo de la carta de Lord Palumbo se puede leer a continuación.
June 14, 2013
Ms. Arielle Assouline-Lichten
Ms. Caroline James
Women in Design
Harvard Graduate School of Design
Cambridge, MA 02138
Dear Arielle Assouline-Lichten and Caroline James,
Thank you for sending your petitions and letters, and those of others, about Ms. Denise Scott Brown and the Pritzker Architecture Prize. Insofar as you have in mind a retroactive award of the prize to Ms. Scott Brown, the present jury cannot do so. Pritzker juries, over time, are made up of different individuals, each of whom does his or her best to find the most highly qualified candidate. A later jury cannot re-open, or second guess the work of an earlier jury, and none has ever done so.
Let us assure you, however, that Ms. Scott Brown remains eligible for the Pritzker Award. That award is given on the basis of an architect’s total body of built work. Ms. Scott Brown has a long and distinguished career of architectural accomplishment. It will be up to present and future juries to determine who among the many architects practicing throughout the world receives future awards. Not every knowledgeable observer always agrees with the jury’s selection. But the jury will continue to do its best to select solely upon the basis of the quality of the architect’s record.
That said, we should like to thank you for calling directly to our attention a more general problem, namely that of assuring women a fair and equal place within the profession. To provide that assurance is, of course, an obligation embraced by every part of the profession, from the schools that might first encourage students to enter the profession to the architectural firms that must facilitate the ability of women to fulfill their potential as architects. We believe that one particular role that the Pritzker Jury must fulfill, in this respect, is that of keeping in mind the fact that certain recommendations or discussions relating to architectural creation are often a reflection of particular times or places, which may reflect cultural biases that underplay a woman’s role in the creative process. Where this occurs, we must, and we do, take such matters into account.
Your communications remind us of this obligation, and we appreciate your sending them. Insofar, however, as they ask us to reopen the decision-making process of a previous jury, we cannot do so.
Yours sincerely,
Lord Peter Palumbo, Chair, On behalf of the Jury of the 2013 Pritzker Architecture Prize.
En 2013 el jurado del Premio Pritzker de Arquitectura está formado por Mr. Peter Palumbo (Presidente), Alejandro Aravena, Stephen Breyer, Yung Ho Chang, Kristin Feireiss, Glenn Murcutt, Juhani Pallasmaa, Ratan N. Tata. Martha Thorne es la Directora Ejecutiva.
Los miembros del jurado lo son durante varios años para asegurar un equilibrio entre los miembros actuales y los nuevos, encargandose de la selección del premio cada año. Ni hay observadores externos, ni miembros de la familia Pritzker están presentes durante las deliberaciones del jurado y votaciones. Los miembros del jurado internacional son reconocidos profesionales en diferentes campos de la arquitectura, los negocios, la educación, la edición y la cultura.
