The idea of a rotating architecture is a constant illusion always given by realities bordering the utopia or the nonsense. Since the machinist illusion began and was consolidated since a couple of centuries ago in the romantic or in science fiction literature, the proposals have been passed from literature to drawing and from there into the constructed reality. Wheels are a reflection of this dizzying iconography.

These fun machines were the first to raise a static movement, quickly became the great attractors of fairs with great public success. The change of perspective of the landscape observed from different vertical and horizontal positions caused the feeling of a unique experience transmitted by word of mouth.

The attempt to transfer the movement to architecture is nothing new. From the avant-gardes of the early twentieth century, like some of the Constructivist and Rationalist proposals, such as the flying cities of Georgy Krutikov, to the City Walking vs Cities: Moving by Archigram, in the 1960s, to more mundane proposals as different viewpoint towers that as icons many cities have developed or tried to develop (eg the static Piruli of Madrid, the London Eye or the Dubai tower project) reflected part of that constant utopian vision to integrate, machine, architecture and movement in a unique component, an image reflecting a unattainable freedom sought by the architecture.

Examples of these architectures are not limited to the avant-garde visions drawn from some architectures or infrastructures, everyday domesticity of residential architecture has also had its glorious visionary example, nearly a century ago, with the Sunflower House. It is a house that turned around itself  in a full circle, duringo one day. The villa "Il Girasole" with a fixed circular base and a rotating L-shaped structure was built between 1930 and 1935 by Angelo Invernizzi and interior designer Ettore Fagiuoli with the help of various friends.

And what relation has all this with the paid articles currently inserted in paper and online publications, articles presented as "natural" or "natural as possible", articles that are actually undercover advertising? New advertising systems that attempt to avoid barriers are increasingly common, developed by all browsers, lately Firefox, to provide its users a more anonymous surfing to avoid the constant bombardment of advertising messages and yet eliminate or reduce the constant data collection by advertising companies of the users surfing the net. Anyone who wants to write and post messages or links to other websites is good for the development of this undercover advertising. People who can write with some knowledge but that it does not involve the costs of the intervention of a professional, whether it is an essayist, a journalist or a specialist. For a small fee, advertisers have guaranteed low profile articles with great impact on their products and networks.

So when a few days ago an article was published stating that the first smart rotatory housing in Europe was put on sale, one is surprised and smiles after it. Not because the article is not well documented, (currently being documented is no longer recognized as a necessary value, it is unfortunately only a complementary value) or because the proposal has or has not an architectural value, the smile comes due to the ingenuity with which some think about the future, a constant static wheel. A waterwheel with memory of fish -rather naive and simple, selling utopias of a century ago that try to update as futuristic ideas with articles done in a "natural" way, "as natural as possible." We are faced with a proliferation of pseudo-articles that invade every means, from the most irrelevant mass-media to the most considered.

At least the advertising, that is hated by some, when it shows us, it is required that it be explicit and not misleading. The debate about whether it is right or not do items where the sale of the product is premium over the rigor of the contents, it is a debate that should emerge quickly.

 

Read more
Read less

More information

José Juan Barba (1964). Architect from the Madrid School of Architecture (ETSAM) in 1991. He received his PhD in Architecture from ETSAM in 2004, graduating summa Cum laude with the doctoral thesis "Inventions: New York vs. Rem Koolhaas, Bernard Tschumi, Piranesi." In 1991, he received a Special Mention in the Spanish National Graduation Awards. Until 1997, he worked as an advisor to several NGOs. In 1992, he founded his architectural practice in Madrid (www.josejuanbarba.com). 

He is an architectural critic and, since 1998, Editor-in-Chief of the internationally acclaimed bilingual architecture journal METALOCUS (Spanish/English), recipient of several national and international awards.

Barba is an Associate Professor at the University of Alcalá and a member of several research groups. He has been invited to participate in numerous international forums on architecture and urbanism, including the II Forum of Mexican World Heritage Cities, Urban Development, History and Modernity, organized by the Pan-American Committee for Urban Development and Historical Heritage; the World Urban Development Forum (FMDU), held in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico; and the International Conference on Architecture and Urbanism from the Perspective of Women Architects. He has also been invited as lecturer and guest critic at numerous national and international institutions, including the National Building Museum, Roma Tre University, Politecnico di Milano, University of Genoa, Université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble, the Madrid and Barcelona Schools of Architecture, National Autonomous University of Mexico, the Faculty of Architecture in Montevideo, the Schools of Architecture of Medellín and Ecuador, Universidad Iberoamericana, IE University, as well as the Schools of Architecture of Zaragoza, Valladolid, Málaga, Granada, Seville, and A Coruña, among others.

He has extensive professional experience in architecture, urbanism, landscape intervention, and territorial regeneration. His work has received numerous awards, including First Prize in the “Gran Vía Posible” competition for Delirious Gran Vía, Madrid; recognition for the Rivers Interpretation Centre in Zamora, awarded and exhibited at the World Architecture Festival 2008; and recognition for the Santa Bárbara Park project in Toledo. He was also awarded the Erich Degner Prize for Architecture (1995), promoted by the BBVA Foundation. His project for a Day Centre for the Elderly was included in Volume 3 of the Madrid Architecture Guide published by the Official College of Architects of Madrid (COAM) in 2007. His work has been widely published in national and international books and journals.

He served as Maître de Conférences at the Institut d’Urbanisme de Grenoble, Université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble, during the 2013–14 academic year, following his appointment through a European open competition. His work has been published internationally. He regularly serves on academic and professional juries, including the editorial competition jury for the journal Quaderns (2011), the selection committee for the European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture – Mies van der Rohe Awards (2007–present), and the jury panels for EUROPAN 13 (2015–16) and TRANSFER, Zurich (2019). He was also invited to participate in the Biennale di Venezia 2016 as part of the exhibition Spaces of Exception / Spazi d’Eccezione.

He has authored several books, including "The Dark Line. michele&miquel, dA Vision Design" (2024), "CONGRESO ANYWAY. La ciudad de las ciudades" (2020), "#Positions" (2016), and "Inventions: New York vs. Rem Koolhaas, Bernard Tschumi, Piranesi" (2015). He has also contributed to publications such as "Espacio público Gran Vía. La Ciudad del Turismo" (2020), "Spaces of Exception / Spazi d’Eccezione" (2016), "La manzana de la discordia" (2015), and "Contemporary Japanese Architecture: New Territories" (2015), as well as chapters in numerous books, including "Women Architects: A Professional Challenge" (2009), "21st Century Architectures" (2007), "Ruta de la Plata, New Conquerors of Space" (2019), and "The City of Tourism" (2020).

Selected awards include:

•    “SANTIAGO AMÓN” AWARD, award for the promotion of architecture, COAM Madrid, 2000.
•    “PANAYIOTI MIXELI AWARD,” SADAS-PEA, award for the promotion of architecture, Athens, 2005.
•    “PIERRE VAGO” ICAC. International Committee of Art Critics Award, London, 2005.
•    FAD Award 07, Ephemeral Interventions, First Prize, M.C. Escher Exhibition, Arquin-FAD, Barcelona, 2007.
•    World Architecture Festival, Center for Research and Interpretation of the Rivers, Tera, Esla, and Órbigo, Finalist, Barcelona, 2008.
•    Gran Vía Posible, First Prize, Delirious Gran Vía, Madrid, 2010.
•    Reform of the Río Segura Surroundings, Award, Murcia, 2010.

Read more
Published on: December 20, 2015
Cite:
metalocus, JOSÉ JUAN BARBA
"Sunflowers vs 'Fresh articles,' 'very fresh' " METALOCUS. Accessed
<https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/sunflowers-vs-fresh-articles-very-fresh> ISSN 1139-6415
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...