Ludwig Hilberseimer was one of the most interesting teachers who worked at the Bauhaus during its last stage. His influence in architecture classes is invaluable. Some of his ideas on urbanism were so innovative for his time that they were not recovered until much later.

The main subjects that intrested Hilberseimer were the construction of "siedlungen" (settlements) and urban centers, as well as new constructions in reinforced concrete, always claiming a purified expression of stylistic features. His work as a professor at the Bauhaus began in 1928, when he was hired by Hannes Meyer as director of construction classes. In spite of a relevant performance, at the beginning he remained in the shade, dedicating himself to plans drawing classes.
 
Hilberseimer finished his studies in 1911 which is when he began his work as a writer and architecture critic. His writings would be key in popularizing Mies van der Rohe, with whom he worked in the founding of the "November Group" and the "Albeitsrat für Kunst".(1) Until the late 1920s, Hilberseimer would not revise his first urban models, such as the Wohnstadt (Residential City) in 1923 or the Hochhausstadt (Vertical City) in 1924.

These works allow us to discover a careful project methodology, based on abstraction. Hilberseimer tries to generate proposals, in order to adapt to the European social changes of the time. This would lead him to develop a review of his previous research on the modern metropolis, transforming it into a less dense model, more diffuse and integrated in the territory. These ideas would cristalize into his conception of the New City, which would reach its full development during his American exile.

As for the criticisms and articles that Hilberseimer wrote, those where he attacked the architects for not being able to adapt to the serial industrial production that would prevail in the future stand out. The architect and urban planner superficially addressed the issues that worried Walter Gropius at that time, both in his activity as an architect and his position in the Bauhaus.

"The architecture of the last century has looked too much into the past. This deficiency has had to be corrected by all kinds of formal tricks. Not even the best architectural works have been more than attempts to use 'beauty' to camouflage necessity. Instead of demanding engineers and the industry to propose new shapes and materials that would make a new formal reality possible, the architects have made a totally senseless use of them: to replace the old ones." (2)
 
Period before the Bauhaus (1911-1928)

The pillars on which Hilberseimer articulates its urban projects are the reflection on the minimum dwelling, housing and the residential typology, sunlight and density as modeling parameters, flows and traffic as an essential element of the metropolitan condition, and lastly, the relationship with the environment which he connects with territorial planning.

Wohnstadt (Residential City), 1923

In 1925 Hilberseimer published his design of  a Wohnstadt (Residential City), dating its development in 1923. Similarly in the scheme of the metropolis, Hilberseimer was interested in the residential building as the most common way of living in German cities. The residential city is a model for a satellite city of 125,000 inhabitants, linked to a metropolitan transport network and with residence as the main theme. The city consisted of 72 blocks arranged in 12 x 6 with approximately 1750 people per block. Each block has an approximate size of 40 x 330 meters. The shorter sides of each block include shops and offices, with the apartments on the longer sides of the 5-story buildings. 

These apartments had always the same size and space, regardless of whether it had a street or a courtyard in between, and they were always located taking into account the orientation of the sun, facing east and west. The interior layout of the apartments was designed so that the rooms faced the patio and the living room and the stairs gave onto the street, allowing cross ventilation.

Hochhausstadt (High Rise City), 1924

In 1924 Hilberseimer designed the High Rise City, published in 1927 in his book Großstadtarchitektur. Here, Hilberseimer raised his principles on architecture and city planning. The architect studied different solutions for the problem of traffic in the Unite dStates, such as the proposal of elevated streets, being influenced by satellite cities, which he had studied and analyzed. From this study he deducts that in spite of solving the problem of housing in the surrounding area, the traffic problem continues to exist. It were these circumstances that made him dedicate his efforts to solve those problems, thus emerging his project of the Hochhausstadt (High Rise City).

This project was probably Hilberseimer's best known. The High Rise City was a model based on practical aspects, designed in terms of the existing technology, as well as the economy and the social context. The idea of ​​Hilberseimer for the city was based on a scheme of organization of relations between parts. The housing block replaces the individual housing, so that the importance of the collective exceeds the individual. His proposal was conceived for a system with a strong central power, the city being the center of said power. The city should be the base of the organization and the states should be organized into larger units. High Rise City was a socialist city.

The city is based on a unit that contains a community. As in medieval cities in which living and working took place in the same building, in the High Rise City the activities were organized vertically in it and both systems of circulations, the vertical and the horizontal, went from home to work. The project of the High Rise City was considered by Hilberseimer to be an authentic vertical city. The city houses 120 blocks ordered in 12 x 10. Each block, of 100 x 600 m, provides housing for 9,000 people and 90,000 m2 of business space.

Period in the Bauhaus (1928-1933)

During the period in which he was working at the Bauhaus, Hilberseimer's work changed from the study of large blocks in residential cities, to devote himself to the design of mixed-use areas with high and low-rise housing. In addition, Hilberseimer changed his ideas on the best orientation for housing, obtaining as a conclusion that the best orientation for residential buildings would be south. Hilberseimer ended up becoming a critic of high density with affirmations such as "A perfect solution is only possible by renouncing the current population density of the metropolis and by an extensive decentralization of the city area."

From blocks of 5 and 10 floors to the L-shaped houses

In 1929, Hilberseimer presents a scheme of 5-story buildings for families, combined with buildings of 10 floors for singles or couples without children. The rooms were oriented east, west and south. "The blocks were arranged so that they have the largest relative solar lighting when the living rooms are assigned in both directions," said Hilberseimer.

In the 1930s, Hilberseimer became interested in single-story L-shaped houses that, according to him, combined the advantages of semi-detached houses with those of independent houses. The L-shaped houses had a garden access to all rooms while getting good insulation from neighbors and a perfect solar exposure.

Period after the Bauhaus (1933-1967)

After the closure of the Bauhaus in 1933 due to Nazi pressure towards modern architects, Hilberseimer was forced into exile, and in 1938 he traveled to Chicago to work at the Illinois Institute of Technology with his old friend Mies. At that time, the United States was experiencing the beginning of a technological and communications revolution, as well as radio, magazines, newspapers and cinema.

With this technological change, the car began to increase its importance, and in the United States there was one car for every five people. Pollution and traffic in the center of the cities led Hilberseimer to develop an alternative city proposal, the Decentralized City.
 
The Decentralized City, 1944

Hilberseimer's Decentralized City was published for the first time in The New City magazine in 1944. The city arose in response to the problems caused by the industrial age. The first phase of this industrialization was based on the concentration of production and separation between the city and the countryside, which is why Hilberseimer thought that the second phase should be focused on decentralization and diversification of production, both agriculture and industry, and a closer relationship between city and countryside.

Hilbersiemer created a system for low densities with units separated by uses. The units differed from each other and were combined into groups. There were three elements: traffic arteries, settlement buildings and the nature that organized it; working separately and without conflict.

The traffic arteries consisted of a combined system of open highways and closed structures, such as the spine of a fish, that created closed areas in the city and replaced intersections and corners with safe and efficient ties.

The buildings were connected to this fishbone structure. The different programs of the city were separated by a very clear area. On one side you will find industrial buildings, along the highway the administrative and commercial buildings, and behind them are different types of housing. Other programs such as schools would be located in the long green areas. In this city you could see some L-shaped houses described above.

The vegetation in the project was treated artificially to serve the user and everything is surrounded by nature, allowing a more direct relationship with it.

During his stay in Chicago, Hilberseimer also worked, along with Mies, in two specific cases, the South Side project in Chicago and the Lafayette project in Detroit, where Hilberseimer's main ideas on urbanism could be seen.

NOTES.-
(1) Both groups were formed after WWI to spread art and culture in Germany. The former included other Bauhaus personalities like Vasili Kandinski and Paul Klee. The latter was founded among others by Bruno Taut and Walter Gropius, and had Erich Mendelsohn and many other artists as its members.
(2) Ludwig Hilberseimer. G Magazine, "Bauhandwerk und Industrie" (Manual construction and industry). Berlin. 1923.

More information

Ludwig Karl Hilberseimer (Karlsruhe, September 14, 1885 - Chicago, May 6, 1967), was an architect and urbanist attached to the expressionism, that thanks to his urbanistic projections and tests, is considered one of the German architects of greater international projection of the twentieth century. He is known for his relationship with Mies van der Rohe and as a teacher at the Bauhaus.

Hilberseimer studied at Karlsruhe Technical University between 1906 and 1911 where he was influenced by one of his professors, Friedrich Ostendorf and by the sober baroque buildings between which he had lived, reflected in his conception of the urban phenomenon and being able to interpret his latest urban works as a prolonged reflection and a persistent criticism of this type of traditional urban uprising. After finishing his studies, in 1911, he moved to Berlin where he met Mies and began his activity as a freelance writer and critic, working in magazines such as Das Kunstblatt and Sozialistische Monatshefte. Until about 1918, Hilberseimer also worked in architectural offices such as Behrens and Neumark, or managed the planning office for Zeppelinhallenbau in Berlin Staaken.

It was between 1918 and 1919 when Hilbersimer and Mies undertook a close relationship at the time of the founding of the November Group and the Albeitsrat für Kunst, where he worked as an architect and urban planner publishing some essays on art and architecture. During his collaboration with Mies they expressed their avant-garde concerns in visual arts and architecture in the magazine "Material zur elementaren Gestaltung" for which Mies claimed the collaboration of Hilberseimer, giving both architects an important international projection. Other publications in which Hilberseimer worked before joining the Bauhaus were "Bauhandwerk und industrie" or "Grobstadarchitektur", as well as architectural and urban planning works such as the planning of the "Weißenhof colony" for the architecture and urbanism exhibition held in 1927 in Stuttgart and that took by title "The housing."

It is not surprising that with this professional curriculum, in 1928, the new director of the Bauhaus Hannes Meyer will count on him to be part of the team of the newly created architecture section. Hilberseimer was entrusted with the direction of the construction and urbanism classes and thus became one of the most interesting teachers who worked in the Bauhaus during the last stage of the school. The architect was in charge of the courses of learning of constructive design and of the seminar of construction of houses and urbanization, always from a position of lefts, which implied a search of architectural and urbanistic solutions conditioned by the social circumstances and by the possibility of the poor classes for paying a house.

His plans and studies reflected his interest in the problems arising from the construction of siedlungen, investigating the relationship between the concentration of buildings and the type of housing for people with few means, leading to a design of special unifamily houses based on his analyzes on urbanism. During the period of Mies as director of the Bauhaus, Hilberseimer became one of the most important teachers of the school, dedicated both to organizational work and restructuring of the curriculum and to the advice of the students themselves.

After the closing of the Bauhaus in 1933, Hilberseimer worked as an architect in Berlin until 1938, when due to his social position, he had to emigrate along with other professors and students of the Bauhaus to the United States to avoid the censorship exercised by the newly imposed party. German National Socialist The German architect settled in Chicago, where he was able to resume a close and friendly collaboration with Mies, working at the Illinois Institute of Technology, where he taught until his death in 1967. Since 1955 Hilberseimer directed the department of urban planning and regional planning, writing some of your most important texts.
Read more

José Juan Barba (1964). Architect from the Madrid School of Architecture (ETSAM) in 1991. He received his PhD in Architecture from ETSAM in 2004, graduating summa Cum laude with the doctoral thesis "Inventions: New York vs. Rem Koolhaas, Bernard Tschumi, Piranesi." In 1991, he received a Special Mention in the Spanish National Graduation Awards. Until 1997, he worked as an advisor to several NGOs. In 1992, he founded his architectural practice in Madrid (www.josejuanbarba.com). 

He is an architectural critic and, since 1998, Editor-in-Chief of the internationally acclaimed bilingual architecture journal METALOCUS (Spanish/English), recipient of several national and international awards.

Barba is an Associate Professor at the University of Alcalá and a member of several research groups. He has been invited to participate in numerous international forums on architecture and urbanism, including the II Forum of Mexican World Heritage Cities, Urban Development, History and Modernity, organized by the Pan-American Committee for Urban Development and Historical Heritage; the World Urban Development Forum (FMDU), held in Culiacán, Sinaloa, Mexico; and the International Conference on Architecture and Urbanism from the Perspective of Women Architects. He has also been invited as lecturer and guest critic at numerous national and international institutions, including the National Building Museum, Roma Tre University, Politecnico di Milano, University of Genoa, Université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble, the Madrid and Barcelona Schools of Architecture, National Autonomous University of Mexico, the Faculty of Architecture in Montevideo, the Schools of Architecture of Medellín and Ecuador, Universidad Iberoamericana, IE University, as well as the Schools of Architecture of Zaragoza, Valladolid, Málaga, Granada, Seville, and A Coruña, among others.

He has extensive professional experience in architecture, urbanism, landscape intervention, and territorial regeneration. His work has received numerous awards, including First Prize in the “Gran Vía Posible” competition for Delirious Gran Vía, Madrid; recognition for the Rivers Interpretation Centre in Zamora, awarded and exhibited at the World Architecture Festival 2008; and recognition for the Santa Bárbara Park project in Toledo. He was also awarded the Erich Degner Prize for Architecture (1995), promoted by the BBVA Foundation. His project for a Day Centre for the Elderly was included in Volume 3 of the Madrid Architecture Guide published by the Official College of Architects of Madrid (COAM) in 2007. His work has been widely published in national and international books and journals.

He served as Maître de Conférences at the Institut d’Urbanisme de Grenoble, Université Pierre Mendès France Grenoble, during the 2013–14 academic year, following his appointment through a European open competition. His work has been published internationally. He regularly serves on academic and professional juries, including the editorial competition jury for the journal Quaderns (2011), the selection committee for the European Union Prize for Contemporary Architecture – Mies van der Rohe Awards (2007–present), and the jury panels for EUROPAN 13 (2015–16) and TRANSFER, Zurich (2019). He was also invited to participate in the Biennale di Venezia 2016 as part of the exhibition Spaces of Exception / Spazi d’Eccezione.

He has authored several books, including "The Dark Line. michele&miquel, dA Vision Design" (2024), "CONGRESO ANYWAY. La ciudad de las ciudades" (2020), "#Positions" (2016), and "Inventions: New York vs. Rem Koolhaas, Bernard Tschumi, Piranesi" (2015). He has also contributed to publications such as "Espacio público Gran Vía. La Ciudad del Turismo" (2020), "Spaces of Exception / Spazi d’Eccezione" (2016), "La manzana de la discordia" (2015), and "Contemporary Japanese Architecture: New Territories" (2015), as well as chapters in numerous books, including "Women Architects: A Professional Challenge" (2009), "21st Century Architectures" (2007), "Ruta de la Plata, New Conquerors of Space" (2019), and "The City of Tourism" (2020).

Selected awards include:

•    “SANTIAGO AMÓN” AWARD, award for the promotion of architecture, COAM Madrid, 2000.
•    “PANAYIOTI MIXELI AWARD,” SADAS-PEA, award for the promotion of architecture, Athens, 2005.
•    “PIERRE VAGO” ICAC. International Committee of Art Critics Award, London, 2005.
•    FAD Award 07, Ephemeral Interventions, First Prize, M.C. Escher Exhibition, Arquin-FAD, Barcelona, 2007.
•    World Architecture Festival, Center for Research and Interpretation of the Rivers, Tera, Esla, and Órbigo, Finalist, Barcelona, 2008.
•    Gran Vía Posible, First Prize, Delirious Gran Vía, Madrid, 2010.
•    Reform of the Río Segura Surroundings, Award, Murcia, 2010.

Read more
Published on: April 29, 2019
Cite:
metalocus, JOSÉ JUAN BARBA
"Urbanism in the Bauhaus. Ludwig Hilberseimer" METALOCUS. Accessed
<https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/urbanism-bauhaus-ludwig-hilberseimer> ISSN 1139-6415
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...