The IS ARCH organization team and the technical jury members composed by Professor Sir Peter Cook, Odile Decq - Studio Oldile Decq, Fuensanta Nieto - Nieto Sobejano Arquitectos, Diego L. Arahuetes - Kengo Kuma, Tomislav Dushanov - Herzog & de Meuron, Gavin Robotham - Cook Robotham Architectural Bureau, Benedetta Tagliabue - Miralles Tagliabue EMBT, agree on that the selection has been really difficult because there are a lot of interesting proposals.
There have been 204 submitted projects.
WINNERS.
1st Prize.- Charles Enrique Infante Bonifaz EXPERIMENTAL PROCESSES FOR THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE URBAN TISSUE IN LIMA CITY - Universidad Ricardo Palma. Perú.
2nd Prize.- Adrian Ubeda Beltran CAN WE DESIGN HOUSING WITHOUT TYPOLOGIES - E.T.S Arquitectura de Madrid. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Spain.
3rd. Prize.- Jean-Marc Stadelmann and David Jenny FOREST OF WALLS - ETH Zurich. Switzerland.
10 HONOURABLE MENTIONS.
- Ludovico Luciani, Caterina Mari Contemporary Landfalls - University of Camerino, School of Architecture and Design. Italy.
- Diego Blasco Estructura viral - Universidad Europea de Madrid. Spain.
- Thomas Savage In Praise Of Nests & Other Things - Northumbria University. UK.
- Carlos Ramos Tenorio Dotacion energetica y apilamiento de atmosferas artificiales en Chelsea - E.T.S Arquitectura de Madrid. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Spain.
- Alan Lau Floating Cities - Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology. Australia.
- Giacomo Calisti, Giulia Domeniconi, Giovanni Maria Laguzzi KAR - The Unconventional City - Facoltà di Architettura Ferrara. Italy.
- Ana Olalla Melián On the wetland - Universidad San Pablo CEU. Spain.
- Nhan Bui Public Arcade_a pilgrimage to San Miniato - Syracuse University. USA.
- Adrián Úbeda Beltrán Rethorical spaces forms of technical production - E.T.S Arquitectura de Madrid. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Spain.
- Isabel Sánchez Del Campo Vertical Marketin Casablanca - E.T.S Arquitectura de Madrid. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Spain.
The evaluation system has been provided with the amount of 80% by the technic jury and 20% by general public votation. The IS ARCH Team understands the Architecture like a tool on the social service and in that way everybody should be able to speak about it.
The maximum puntuation with 20 points was given to the project that got the bigger amount of votes on our website and 0 points to the one that did not get none, therefore the remaining projects’ points have been defined between this interval proportionally. In the same way the 80 points from jury members have been calculated.
