At a time of great design creativity for the Municipality of Prato the results of the competition for the Parco Centrale adds yet another voice to the important and innovative debate on contemporaneity that is currently underway in the city. Bernard Tschumi said about the winning proposal: “The project is remarkable in the way it understands and celebrates the history of Prato and of its medieval walls. At the same time, it looks to the future and to the development of the city and its diverse population.”

The past September 1st, OBR Paolo Brescia and Tommaso Principi with Michel Desvigne Paysagiste won the first prize in the international competition to design the new Parco Centrale (Central Park) in Prato, Italy, a 3-hectare park in the heart of the city which has appeared after the former Misericordia e Dolce hospital's demolition. The jury - chaired by Bernard Tschumi - has selected them as winners among 10 finalists, that all expressed new ideas on the contemporary city and its relationship with the landscape. The winning project stood out for its ability to offer to the city of Prato an original, innovative and practical solution. 
 

Project description by OBR + Michel Desvigne Paysagiste

The urban fabric of the city of Prato is peculiar because of its extreme regularity. Its orthogonal grid, a trace of the ‘cardo’ and the ‘decumano’ of Roman origins, is still very persistent and is striking for its spatial and temporal diffusion. rom the historical city center to the industrial and agricultural suburbs, the orthogonal grid is deeply rooted in the landscape. Thanks to its proper measure and its flexibilit, it still governs the structure and the homogeneous sizing of built areas, of industrial and agricultural field. Residences, factories, warehouses, orchards and vegetable gardens... Juxtapositions are intense and they yield a complex though harmonius urban fabric, one that can be easily read. In order to fit within this textur, the three hectares of the future park within the city walls can’t simply be a large void. Our park gives a structure to the site in order to perfectly fit in the uran layout of the city of Prato.The park presents an elaborate vegetal and mineral composition that we conceived by interpreting three-dimensionally a specific artography.

The aerial views of Prato, that show a succession of vegetation and factories, have been decrypted, superimposed, developed. We abstracted the rythms and the geometric motifs that reorganize the substance of the city. And these elements become the matrix upon which we imagine the new possible landscape for the park. By means of this graphic process, we define the geometric laout of the mineral surfaces and of greenery, whose pace is defined by hedges which articulate the sit, running parallel to the ‘cardo’. The park is dominated by a large presence of trees, most of them already present on the site; the geometrical layout is freely superimposed onto them.It’s not a simplistic transposition of an urban phenomenon and of its traces, rather a creative endeavor that starts from the memory of the place and from its original urban forms to manipulate them, through abstraction, in order to finally constitute a sstem that truly belongs to the site, one that is perfectly fitting with its contex.The park at the same time evokes traces of the city of Prato and of the Italian Renaissance gardens, organized according to perspectives, pergolas and hedges, and reinterprets them in a contemporary language. The various elements – vegetation, mineral and water – dialogue among themselves and yield a spatial composition where one can discover art pieces. 

To the South of the park, a rather shallow body of water runs along the old city wall, between users and the historical artifact. Just like a baroque artific, water reflects the medieval wall:it doubles its height and enhances its monumentality. By multiplying the vanishing points and the possible paths, the sequence of hedges defines spaces whose dimnsions are similar to those of piazzas in the city center. The park will be an important gate for visitors to access the historical city center.The park becomes the place where one can immediately comprehend the scale and the rational order of the historical city.

This multiplication of gardens accommodates a particular kind of vegetation that echoes the artistic programming of the site. On Viale della Repubblica in Prato is the Pecci Center for contemporary art. By proposing a program that is so closely tied to contemporary art, we wished to find an ‘inta-muros’ presence for this institution, so as to fitwithin the cultural agenda of the city of Prato. To the north of the site, the pavilion is a one-storey structure, open towards the park. Beside restaurants and other park-related facilities, it accommodates ample spaces for artists’ ateliers and temporary exhibitions.The park itself soars to the status of open-air museum. In the heart of the park contemporary sculptures are exhibited, along with a collection of plants that will be selected not merely for their botanical features, but also for their aesthetic qualities, their colors, their exuberance. Displayed in such manner, these natural elements will become art pieces themselves.

 
THE RANKING:

Winner

– Paolo Brescia (OBR Paolo Brescia and Tommaso Principi) – group leader
Michel Desvigne (Michel Desvigne Paysagiste)
Alberto Romeo (Intertecno)
with Tommaso Principi (OBR Paolo Brescia and Tommaso Principi), Elisa Siffredi (OBR
Paolo Brescia e Tommaso Principi), Enrico Ferraris (Michel Desvigne Paysagiste),
Massimiliano Marzo (Intertecno)

 
Second place

– Ferdinand Ludwig (Baubotanik) – group leader
Daniel Schönle
Markus Allman (Allmann Sattler Wappner)
Carlo Scoccianti
with Lukasz Lendzinski (Umschichten), Peter Weigand, Sergio Sanna, Bernhard Scharf
(green4cities)

 
Third place ex aequo

– Benedetta Tagliabue (EMBT | Enric Miralles – Benedetta Tagliabue) – group
leader
with Matteo Francesco Ruta (Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento ABC), Gabriele
Masera (Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento ABC)

– Emanuele Barili – group leader
Alejandro Aravena (ELEMENTAL)
Gonzalo Arteaga Rozas (ELEMENTAL)
Cosimo Balestri
Teresa Moller (Teresa Moller Landscape Studio)
with Olivia Gori, Mattia Di Carlo, Knut Stockhusen

Fourth place ex aequo

– Rients Dijkstra (MAXWAN ARCHITECTS + URBANISTS) – group leader
with Franca Maria Luisa Neonato (PN STUDIO)

– Massimo Alvisi (Alvisi Kirimoto) – group leader
Petra Blaisse (Inside Outside)
Maurizio Milan (Milan Ingegneria)
Alessio Montanari
with Giampiero Aresi, Aniello Camarca, Eloisa Susanna

– Martino Tattara (Dogma) – group leader
Pier Vittorio Aureli (Dogma)
Luciano Aletta (Dogma)
Paolo Rigoni (StudioSilva)
Marco Sassatelli (StudioSilva)
with Elia Zenghelis

Fifth place ex aequo

– Dominique Jakob (Jakob + MacFarlane Architects) – group leader
Pablo Georgieff (Coloco)
Laura Gatti
with Francesca Borrelli

– Roberto Pasini (AUS pasini ranieri) – group leader
Kongjian Yu (TURENSCAPE)
Giovanni Grappeggia (Studio Verde)
Marco Francia, Deris Ortali (Eltec)
Andrea Ranieri (AUS pasini ranieri)
Matteo Giulianelli

– Dan Dorell (DORELL.GHOTMEH.TANE/ARCHITECTS) – group leader
Lina Ghotmeh (DORELL.GHOTMEH.TANE/ARCHITECTS)
Tsuyoshi Tane (DORELL.GHOTMEH.TANE/ARCHITECTS)
Franck Boutté (FRANCK BOUTTÉ CONSULTANTS)
Klaas De Rycke (BOLLINGER + GROHMANN)
Simone Murr (BOLLINGER + GROHMANN)
Laure Vandeputte (BOLLINGER + GROHMANN)
Gabriel Auger (BOLLINGER + GROHMANN)
with Marco Tosato, Leonardo Oprandi
 
Read more
Read less

More information

Label
Architects
Text
OBR Open Building Research
+ + copy Created with Sketch.
- + copy Created with Sketch.
Label
Venue
Text
Prato. Italy
+ + copy Created with Sketch.
- + copy Created with Sketch.
Label
Landscape
Text
Michel Desvigne (Michel Desvigne Paysagiste)
+ + copy Created with Sketch.
- + copy Created with Sketch.
OBR was established by Paolo Brescia and Tommaso Principi in 2000 to investigate new ways of contemporary living, creating a design network between Milan, London and Mumbai. 

The Team of OBR develops its experimental line through the participation in international projects concerning public-private social programs. OBR intends urban design as a discipline whose effects extend beyond the physical boundaries of the project, beyond the public/private and individual/community dichotomy. Their research promotes – through architecture – the sense of community and the individual identities, design being intended as the outcome of a cooperative and evolutive process. 

OBR’s projects have been featured in international exhibitions, including the 10th Architecture Biennale in Venice (2006); Architecture: Where to (London, 2007); V Bienal de Arquitetura (Brasilia, 2007); XI Bienal Internacional de Arquitectura (Buenos Aires, 2007); AR Award Exhibition (Berlin, 2008); China International Architectural Expo (Beijing, 2009); International Expo (Shanghai, 2010); 24th UIA World Congress of Architecture (Tokyo, 2011); Gold Medal for Italian Architecture (Milan, 2012); Athenaeum Museum of Architecture and Design (Chicago, 2012); International Green Building Summit (Istanbul, 2012); MAXXI (Rome, 2013) and 14th Architecture Biennale in Venice (2014).

Tommaso Principi was born in 1970. After studying engineering at the University of Bologna, he studied architecture at the University of Genoa, where he graduated in 1999. He works with Renzo Piano from 1998 to 2000 when he founded with Paolo Brescia OBR Open Building Research, creating a network between Genoa, Milan, London and New York, then extended to Mumbai and Accra. He has been invited as a guest professor at several universities such as Kent State University, University of Genoa, Milan Polytechnic, University of Bologna, La Sapienza, University of Messina, Reggio Calabria University and Chinese University Hong Kong CUHK.

Paolo Brescia is an Italian architect and founder of Open Building Research.He graduated with a degree in architecture from the Politecnico di Milano in 1996 and had his academic fellowship at Architectural Association in London. After working with Renzo Piano, he founded in 2000 OBR with Tommaso Principi to investigate new ways of contemporary living, creating a design network among Milan, London and Mumbai. He combines his professional experience with the academic world as guest lecturer in several athenaeums, such as Accademia di Architettura di Mendrisio, Kent State University, Aalto University, University of Oulu, Academy of Architecture of Mumbai, College of Architecture of Pune, Mimar Sinan Fine Art University, Hacettepe University. He was university professor in charge at the Faculty of Industrial Design at the Politecnico di Milano (2004-2005) and professor of architectural design at University of Genoa (2013-2015).

Read more
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...
Loading content ...